10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: BSD-3-Clause.

10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

110 out of 218 API elements (50.5 %) have documentation comments.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: fvp, fvp.VideoPlayerRegistrant.VideoPlayerRegistrant.new, fvp.VideoPlayerRegistrant.registerWith, mdk, mdk.AudioCodecParameters.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 5 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

These platforms are not supported:

These issues are present but do not affect the score, because they may not originate in your package:

0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support

This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 16 issues. Showing the first 2:

    ╷
267 │   Future<void> dispose(int textureId) async {
    │                            ^^^^^^^^^
    ╵

    ╷
358 │   Future<void> setLooping(int textureId, bool looping) async {
    │                               ^^^^^^^^^
    ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.